I've found myself wondering today
Why the rush for babies to start solids?
With my first child (4), our pediatrician at her 6-month check-up said:
"You can go ahead and start her on rice cereal now."
Me: "Oh, is she not gaining enough weight?"
Pedi: "No, it's just standard to introduce solids around this time."
Me: "Ok, but she seems happy with just breastmilk right now, is it important that I introduce solids?"
Pedi: "Well if you wait too long, she can have trouble eating solids later in life."
Me: "Huh, well why rice cereal?"
Pedi: "It's the most common first food because it's easy for baby to digest and has a bland taste."
Hmmm...I wasn't exactly convinced of, well, anything at all. I just didn't understand why it was important to introduce solids - I simply assumed that when my milk wasn't enough, then my baby would demand more and/or stop gaining weight. I felt very in tune with my baby's cues and felt confident that I would know the proper time to give my little punkin' solid foods. A standard time-stamp for every baby seemed a little silly.
Furthermore, RICE CEREAL?!?! Reeeealy? When I look at data of American children, I see an obesity epidemic of stunning proportions. One of the main contributors to this very sad crisis, is the over-consumption of highly processed and nutritionally-valueless foods. Rice cereal out of a box is simply that: processed white carbs whose nutrition has been sapped out, and then added back in through manipulated chemicals in a process called "enriching". America, and it's children, are addicted to these white carbs, and yet, parents are advised to give them to their babies, at a very young age, as a first food?
Ok, I know what [some of] you are saying: "But my processed rice cereal out of a box is from X Natural Foods Store and is made out of brown rice!" Ok, good - that's at least one step ahead, but ask please ask yourself: is it normal for rice to be in the form of really thin flakes? It is normal if it's processed. And right there valuable nutrition has been lost.
Next point - is rice cereal easy for baby to digest? On a box of rice cereal I happened upon (for research purposes, of course) in the grocery store the other day, it clearly said on the back:
XXX Infant Rice Cereal can cause constipation in infants. Please see your health care provider if your baby has vomiting, bloody stools or constipation for more than three days.
Hmmm. Sounds like even the company ackowledges that rice cereal is not easy for infants to digest, being as that is the nature of constipation. If you've ever followed the BRAT guidelines for diarrhea (Bananas, Rice, Applesauce, Toast), it seems odd that rice cereal would be a first food for an underdeveloped infant digestive system.
Here is the ingredient list for a traditional box of Brown Rice Infant Cereal:
Rice Flour, Soy Oil Lecithin, Tri & Dicalcium Phosphate, Tocopherol
(Vitamin E), Electrolytic Iron, Zinc Sulfate, Niacinamide (A C
Vitamin), Riboflavin (Vitamin B2), Pyridoxine Hydrochloride (Vitamin
B6), Thiamine (Vitamin B1), Folic Acid (Folate) (A B Vitamin), Vitamin
B12 (Cyanocobalamin)
Doesn't look too bad at first glance, but that seems like a lot of mystery-source add-ins for a simple rice cereal. Rice is a grain so it should go bad, but this box has about a 3 year shelf-life. Yowza.
As for the bland taste my pediatrician talked about, she was spot on there. Yuck.
Now you say: "OK! I GET IT! YOU DON'T LIKE RICE CEREAL IN A BOX!
My Pediatrician also stated that my baby could have "problems eating solids later in life." BZZZZZZ. False. There is absolutely zero scientific data to back this up, and if that were in fact the case, then wouldn't the human race have died off through all those centuries when mother's nursed their babies exclusively for at least a year before introducing food? In many countries, moms still nurse exclusively for a year or more and in countries with severe malnurishment, the nursing babies are often the only ones thriving!
Case in point #2: I breastfed my first baby exclusively for 8 months before introducing solids. And if being able to polish off four corn cobs in one sitting is a sign of "problems eating solids later in life", then she's definitely got that.
Case in point #3: My second child, a preemie, had only breastmilk (after the NICU we detoxed the supplemental formula they mixed in with my breastmilk) for the first 13 months of her life. She's got a record for eating 3 adult sized bowls of Zucchini Oatmeal (my special recipe!) and just today chowed her way through 1/4 of an entire watermelon. I'm pretty sure she doesn't have any eating problems.
Case in point #4: My third baby has baby fat rolls on the middle of his thighs - not at the knee, not at the hip, but the middle of this thigh. I've also never really seen his neck. He's got a virgin gut yet at 8 months and is certainly not suffering from lack of food.
If you are a parent who chose to introduce solids early to your baby, and/or used rice cereal, I would say you are among the majority of Americans that are simply trying to do the best thing they know for their kids.
But as I've (gradually) learned....there are more choices for families than what my pediatrician told me. Stay tuned for more tips on alternative first foods for babies. Here's a clue about the first food we start with:

Also, if you are in the Dickinson area this Saturday, July 10th at 9am, we will be having a "Make Your Own Baby Food" class at Stringbean Co. Everyone is welcome (including your wee-ones!). We will also discuss making meals for a variety of eating levels, with minimal prep.